# BRLibToHelp - Generate CHM Help Files for Your B&R Automation Libraries

**URL:** <https://community.br-automation.com/t/brlibtohelp-generate-chm-help-files-for-your-b-r-automation-libraries/9675>\
**Category:** Others\
**Tags:** automation-studio, toolkit\
**Created:** [January 13, 2026, 8:45am UTC](https://community.br-automation.com/t/brlibtohelp-generate-chm-help-files-for-your-b-r-automation-libraries/9675 "2026-01-13T08:45:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paddern](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/FF8800/32.png) [@Paddern](https://community.br-automation.com/u/Paddern)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2026, 3:13pm UTC](https://community.br-automation.com/t/brlibtohelp-generate-chm-help-files-for-your-b-r-automation-libraries/9675/7 "2026-01-19T15:13:35Z")

</div>

I think this should be adressed as feature in this topic:

> [@How can B&R Community help with definition of new AS Features](https://community.br-automation.com/t/how-can-b-r-community-help-with-definition-of-new-as-features/9205):
>
> Hi Jaroslav, I think I may have misunderstood the purpose of the feedback category — thanks for clarifying. Now that I get it, I’d like to suggest something for the Community itself: it could be really useful to have a space for proposing new AS features, with voting/polling or another way to gauge interest in potential improvements. It would give both users and product teams a better sense of what the community values, while still complementing the official request process. Would it make sens…

This python script is for generating a .chm file

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.br-automation.com/t/brlibtohelp-generate-chm-help-files-for-your-b-r-automation-libraries/9675)._
