CP1585 to CP1585 Powerlink communication with Safety

Hello everyone,
i would like to create a setup of two CPUs that communicate via Powerlink.
My idea was to set it up as shown in the picture, but the “CP1585_B” does not find the “SL8100” when the Powerlink interface is in “controlled node” mode.
Somehow understandable for me, because the SL8100 itself is a controlled node and needs a managing node to be able to communicate, right?
If I switch the “CP1585_B” to “managing mode” then the SL8100 is found directly and the system itself works.
However, I cannot then communicate between CPU A and B.

Maybe I’m missing something fundamental here, but unfortunately I don’t know what to do at the moment.
Do you have any tips for me?

Thank you very much!

Why don’t you use the _B-CPU as the managing node and the _A-CPU as iCN? In one powerlin-network you can have only one managing node. And as I know the SL8100 needs to have to connected CPU (“B”) being a managing Node.

Depending on your requirement of the machine, “Open Safety Over UDP” could also solve your problem. With this you can simply connect Safe Nodes via Standard-Ethernet ports without Powerlink.
See more: B&R Online Help

Hey Samuel, thanks for the reply!
The _A-CPU may also be a CP1585 with an SL8100 instead of the SLX.
_B-CPU must stay the same.

I guess in this case the _A-CPU needs a new PLK network (using an IF1082 e.g.)?

The “Open Safety Over UDP”, however, looks very interesting. But I need mappSafety for this, right?
We are not using mappSafety at the moment, unfortunately.

For the moment I changes the roles (managing node ↔ controlled node) and it is working.
Thank you!

Yes, if the A-CPU has also a X20SL8100 which is connected to the PLK of the CPU you need a second PLK IF as you mentioned.
I’m not 100% sure, but I think the Open Safety Over UDP connection is also possible with Safety Release, so you don’t need mappSafety.

Hi @timo.gasser ,

It looks like you got some good suggestions from other community members, and it has been a couple of weeks since the last activity on this post. Can you please mark the reply that helped you the most as the solution? Or if you still have open questions on this topic, can you please provide an update?

Jaroslav