The new 'SURVEY' on mappView and connectivity to third-party PLCs is still active

[kovarj (Jaroslav Kovar)]

Hello BRCommunity ,

A week ago, we started and shared a survey with you about mappView and connectivity to third-party PLCs.

The survey is still open, and the discussion remains active. Feel free to share your thoughts and ideas—let’s continue the conversation!

Even if it doesn’t seem like it, your feedback and ideas matter and we discuss every single comment.

SURVEY : mappView and connectivity to 3rd party PLCs – Your Feedback Matters!

Hello BRCommunity , Have you ever faced a use case where you wanted to use mappView as a frontend while the backend control was handled by a non-B&R PLC? I have. I worked on a case where a B&R customer had a well-optimized, universal visualization developed in mappView for all their machine series. However, not all machines were controlled by B&R, and they wanted their mappView visualization to remain independent of the backend control. While this is already possible, i…

---

Are you interested in the survey results summary? Let me know in the poll—at least 20 “yes” votes are needed

• Yes, I’m interested
• No, I’m not interested
• Just clicking

Thanks in advance for all your contributions!

Jaroslav