Hi @harshagowda0707 ,
Could please upload SystemDump?
You are using SafeMOTION, so what about the enable of the drive?
Is your safety application running?
In Ax test window you can check in the ax structure below:
a flickering position is quite normal and nothing to worry about. Once you switch on the controller, it should stop flickering.
What’s more of interest is that you marked the case of “an error”, but did not show the actual error you get - you can switch the view with the traffic light button in the watch view of the test window - the traffic light in the command section acknowledges an error.
I am able to do the control on and do the axis home abut still the error bit is triggering and, in the description, also not able to find anything related to these issues in the safety logs and in the diag section which Valerio mentioned
Hi @harshagowda0707 ,
if (with simulation disabled) you can power on (the enable input is true) and home the axis (no issue with encoder) next step will be trace the set and actual position (+ lag error) when you command a movement.
It would be interesting to see the scaling pars too:
once more you failed to provide any relevant information regarding “the error bit”. I asked you which exact error you are getting and even told you how to get to it.
I am leaving this one to Valerio since it seems to be of no use to invest my time here.
Sorry for the late reply, I tried what you told previously but unfortunately, I did not get any errors in the error window which could lead this investigation.
Let me know if you need anything else.
A single ACOPOS P3 axis shows extreme fluctuations in its velocity value (monitor.s in NC Manager).
The velocity occasionally drops into underflow, which continuously triggers errors.
As a result, the affected axis cannot be commissioned.
Key Observations
The system contains many axes (32 in identical configuration), and only one is affected.
The issue appears to be software-related, not hardware-related.
The strongest indicator:
Renaming the axis causes the problem to move to another axis.
Reverting the name moves the issue back.
This strongly suggests that the problem is tied to software logic, configuration mapping, or internal handling of axis identifiers, rather than physical components.
Tests Performed
1. Hardware Tests (all indicate no defect)
The team systematically swapped or modified all relevant hardware components:
Motor swap (with known good motor) → no change
Switching ACOPOS P3 channels (1 ↔ 2) → no change; hardware worked fine under different axis reference
Replacing ACOPOS P3 unit + motor cable → no change
Changing node number (e.g., ST32 → ST111) → no change
Swapping node numbers between drive combinations → no change; hardware worked elsewhere
Manually moving the axis → position updates correctly, but issue remains
Conclusion:
All tests confirm hardware is functioning correctly and not the root cause.
2. Software & Configuration Tests
Parameter & Configuration Checks
Compared all parameters (including safety) with working axes → no differences found
Ran the axis in standard simulation → no effect
Checked and adjusted bus cycle times → no effect
Updated firmware (ACOPOS + motor objects) → no effect
Reduced system load (removed 8 axes) → no effect
Critical Test: Axis Renaming
Renaming axis (e.g., gAx1 → gX1) →
Problem moves to a different, previously working axis
Renaming again → no further movement
Restoring original name → problem returns to original axis
Conclusion:
The issue is strongly correlated with axis naming / reference mapping.
Suggests a hidden dependency or corruption tied to axis identifiers.
3. Upgrade Attempt
Attempted upgrade to ACP10 v5.31.3 → blocked
Reason: Arnc0man library remains at incompatible version (V3.13) and cannot be upgraded with current package
Overall Diagnostic Conclusion
From all evidence in the email:
Not a hardware issue
Not caused by physical wiring, motor, or drive
Not due to configuration differences or bus timing
Highly likely a software issue related to axis mapping, naming, or internal data handling
Additionally, the team suspects:
Something in the system may be incorrectly accessing or corrupting the motor speed value internally.
Hi @harshagowda0707 ,
I read your comment 4 times, twice before I drunk my Italian coffee and twice after that and I have the same thought : Unfortunately I don’t know how I can help you,
we asked additional information and you didn’t provide them + now I see you report an additional issue with Arnc0man library.
You created this post 14 days ago, you deserve an answer, so I recommend to call our Support in India.