HMI Connect to the Server is lost

[kovarj (Jaroslav Kovar)]

• This table is a recommendation, not a hard limit. It’s something you should consider during visualization development.
• There are widgets with higher performance requirements as well as with lower performance requirements.
• The number of active bindings per page can be checked using the mappView server diagnostics server
• The points that you required to increase WD, along with this table, indicate that you are running your hardware at its limit. Take this into consideration and think about whether you can split your widgets into more pages or to more contents and load them dynamically.

Something more to read:

HMI low performance and rebooting after importing framework components

A customer is using a 6PPT80.101E-16A HMI with an X20CP1684. They have imported components from Framework for recipe, userX, report, file backup and alarms. After changing the code to match the project, the performance of the HMI is slow and is rebooting in between. They say The HMI was alright before they downloaded the screens imported from framework. What possible step could we ask them to take. Would adding each framework component one by one and testing it be a good start?

Mapp View - Performance recommendations

The performance of a mapp View HMI application depends on many factors and can vary greatly depending on the implementation of the HMI application. The following guidelines outline several factors and suggestions that can improve or optimize the performance of an HMI application. The functionality of the mapp View HMI application depends on the selected client and server hardware, but also on the software design of the mapp View HMI application. For example, the specific widget classes are rec…